I really like Homeland.

It’s surprising, morally dubious and confusing – just the way I like it. It also has a strong female character as the main protagonist. However, I can’t stop thinking that she is broken. She is emotionally unstable, has mental problems and her operations as a CIA agent make me feel uncomfortable all too often.

There are lots of strong male characters who have dark secrets, like losing their wife and children in car accidents (which they didn’t cause) or blaming themselves for the deaths of innocents (which they could not prevent), but somehow find it hard to imagine a male protagonist whose dark secret is emotional instability and mental illness. I do not recall a male agent having sex with a married suspect to acquire information. Also there are lots of renegade heroes out there, breaking the rules for the greater good, but I can’t see them  saving lives by threatening the villain’s children.

I know it was intentional – blurring the line between the good and the bad guys, but I can’t stop thinking that the main protagonist is a woman only because this kind of flawed character is unacceptable as a man but “passable” as a woman.

Or maybe it’s an advantage, maybe the new hero, the one more suitable for the new wars fought not against nations or governments but on ideas and worldviews, is a woman.

But is it a good thing?

About weirdism

This entry was posted in feminism, movie, women and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s